Samay Raina and her show ‘India’s Got Latent’ is no stranger to controversies. Although so far the show and the participants have tried not to escalate any issues to increase the legal problems, it was learned that the contestant from Bihar has been heavily criticized after portraying himself as “anti-social” on ‘India’s Got Latent’ Season 2. During his research, he made several controversial statements about men, marriage, and his family, which did not go down well with the Internet audience. Read below to find out what happened
‘India’s Got Latent’ is a contestant who introduced himself as ‘hater of man ‘
In the third episode of the latest season, the contestant, Sakshi Jha, portrayed herself as ‘anti-social’. His rehearsal video is going viral on social media. On the one hand, while he has publicly described himself as a “socialist,” on the other hand, his Instagram profile says the same thing. His biography reads, “The most dangerous of Patriarchy.” During her time on the show, she revealed that her boyfriend cheated on her.And the negative comments against men didn’t stop there. He also made some critical comments about his future. “Pati ko daru pi ke marna hai, (I want to beat my husband after drinking alcohol),” she wrote as part of her reply. Jha then said that she does not like the men in her family, including her father and brother.His words left the cast that included Samay Raina, Tanmay Bhat, Vishal Dadlani, Raghu Ram and Yashraj Mehra unimpressed. This is the first time in Latent’s history that the group has given zero. Interestingly, despite zero from the group, Sakshi rated eight of her performances.At one point, Samay asked him, “Who did I hurt you?” and answered, Men. Samay, being Samay, replied, “That’s why we say, ‘Teach the girl,'”As the discussion continued, Samay asked the audience to give their verdict which did not differ from the group’s decision.
The internet is abuzz with the introduction to Sakshi Jha’s ‘Man-Hater’ episode
Following his performance, social media users flooded the comment sections with various responses. Jha received a lot of backlash for her comments, but many netizens also responded to the show’s quality.Another X-user wrote, “Man-hating girl from Bihar rejected her father on India’s Got Latent because of speculation.Tanmay: What about your father, he is also a manSakshi: I told him, I really hate him ewwwwwHer mental state was so bad that even the ladies on the show gave her 0 marks, let alone the rest of the team. Samay Raina, Tanmay and Raghu cooked him well”Another source said, “Women like her are why men are not safe in India– She hates all men.
- He hates his father.
- He hates his brother.
- He hates his grandmother. She said that her intention was to beat her husband with a belt when he was drunk. He is also racist because he said that Samay Raina looks good to him because she is fair. Credit to the whole team because the whole team gave him 0 points on India’s Got Latent (© – Netflix / Samay Raina YT)
“After watching Sakshi Jha on The Latent, I want to say on behalf of all women, I’m sorry.And no, we don’t all hate our fathers,” said the netizen.Here is another message from internet users:“This 18-year-old girl, Sakshi Jha, from Bihar, who claims to be a teacher, WANTS TO FIT HER HUSBAND WITH A BELT WHEN HE’S DRUNK.THE ONLY TALENT HAS “KUDA AMENS”He hates his father, grandfather & even his brotherThere is no NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR AME IN INDIA to know suo moto about MISANDRY or to say that he wants to be a murderer.I thank this lady for going on a popular platform & exposing TOXIC FEMINISM wellShe wouldn’t be surprised if she killed a man in the future.If a man has shown that he wants to beat a woman on such a stage, it cannot be taken as a joke. They will be thrown out of the show after the first line itself. But he was allowed to express his opinion fully. Unfortunately, they will be rewarded with many other followers & maybe even brands.EQUALITY”Some netizens also say that if such words had been said by a man against a woman, people would have called for action, and the person would have already been in jail.